MOVIE REVIEW: Contraband (2012)

John Bryce (Mark Wahlberg) used to be a very successful smuggler but he’s turned over a new leaf and is now a security consultant and family man. Unfortunately his brother-in-law, Andy (Caleb Landry Jones) has been carrying on the family business behind John’s back and has crossed, Briggs (Giovanni Ribsi), who is more than a bit of a shit.

Briggs wants his money back and Andy dead and the only way he’ll relent is if John does one last run for him. For reasons unknown, since Andy is complete wank flannel, John agrees. He leaves his wife, Kate (Kate Beckinsale) and two young sons in the care of his mate, Sebastian (Ben Foster) and heads off to Panama on a freighter with his former crew.

Of course, nothing goes smoothly and it’s not long before John realises he has no idea who he can trust either at home or abroad.

Mark likes to get up at 2:30am, look at his cardboard and then lie in his cryochamber for recovery

Contraband is not unwatchable but it doesn’t have much going for it. The story is so unoriginal that I feel like I have seen this film twelve times before. It also fails hopelessly on character development. A clichéd plot can be saved if you really care about the characters but in this case I honestly couldn’t form any connection.

One would assume that John has gone straight out of love for Kate but there is zero chemistry between Wahlberg and Beckinsale. Further to this Andy is just a nothing character. He’s Kate’s brother but there’s no demonstration of why they have a bond so strong that her husband would risk his life for him. I mean mostly he comes across as a bit of a snivelling idiot. Consequently the performances of all these actors are as flat as a witch’s tit (as my A-level history teacher used to say). Giovanni Ribisi can be a scene stealer but he overacts so badly here that he comes across as a bit of a joke. Ben Foster is okay as the conflicted Sebastian but it’s hard to understand what his motivations are, so he is wasted.

A film about a daring smuggling operation should be exciting but I found my attention wondering throughout.

Probably best skipped.



  1. I watched this on Film 4, a couple of years ago. (It tends to be on all the time!) I am not a huge fan of MW, other than in ‘Ted’, and that’s only because of Ted. I agree with your conclusion. Seen it all before, and done better too. 🙂
    Best wishes, Pete.

    1. It’s just a bit of a nothing film and you’d miss nothing by skipping it.

abbiosbiston is listening...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.